Asked by
Anupa Sajikumar
on Nov 29, 2024
Verified
In the Berardi v. Meadowbrook Mall Company case, the court found:
A) plaintiffs must produce subjective evidence of their duress to win a case of economic duress.
B) duress is readily accepted by the courts as a reason to avoid a contract.
C) economic duress must leave the plaintiff no reasonable alternative but to acquiesce to the terms of the contract.
D) plaintiffs who prove economic duress may void the transaction, and this is their complete remedy.
Economic Duress
This involves the use of unlawful pressure or threats by one party to compel another party to act in a way that is against their will or financial interest.
Subjective Evidence
Information or proof based on personal feelings, opinions, or tastes, rather than concrete facts.
Acquiesce
The reluctant acceptance or agreement without protest, often implicitly.
- Discriminate between fraud, duress, and undue influence in the realm of contract law.
- Separate void from voidable contracts in differing conditions.
Verified Answer
LP
Learning Objectives
- Discriminate between fraud, duress, and undue influence in the realm of contract law.
- Separate void from voidable contracts in differing conditions.