Regarding Damian's assertion that the statute of frauds is not satisfied because Frida did not sign the document, which of the following is true?

A) Damian is correct.
B) Damian is incorrect because he is the one being sued, and he signed the document.
C) Damian is incorrect because the statute of frauds did not require her signature so long as the selling price was referenced.
D) Damian is incorrect because the statute of frauds did not require her signature so long as the type of subject matter involved was referenced.
E) Damian is incorrect because the statute of frauds did not require her signature so long as the parties were clearly identified.

Question

Vanessa Guzman · Accepted Answer

Final Answer : B, Explanation :  Damian is incorrect because he is the one being sued, and he signed the document. In the context of the statute of frauds, which requires certain contracts to be in writing and signed by the party to be charged, the key issue is that the party being sued (in this case, Damian) has signed the document. The statute does not require the signature of the party who is suing (Frida) for the contract to be enforceable against the party who signed it (Damian).

Definitions

Learning Objectives

Learning Objectives

Related questions