Tyler has always had a 180-day full warranty from Business Sales Company when purchasing office equipment over the past five years.On this occasion,Tyler purchased a big screen LED TV from Business Sales that broke thirty days after Tyler purchased it.Business Sales asserts that it did not provide a 180-day full warranty on the TV and has no legal liability.Which of the following is true of this situation?A) Tyler cannot assert a warranty since Business Sales has not provided a full warranty on the product.B) Tyler may assert a warranty based upon past dealings with Business Sales.C) Business Sales can escape liability by asserting that the defect was caused by the manufacturer.D) Tyler can bring a suit against Business Sales and claim punitive damages.

Question

Raquel Sanchez · Accepted Answer

Final Answer : B, Explanation :  Tyler may be able to assert a warranty based on past dealings with Business Sales. The fact that Business Sales has always provided a 180-day full warranty on office equipment purchased by Tyler in the past might be evidence that Tyler reasonably expected the same warranty for the TV. However, further information would be needed to determine the outcome of any potential legal action.

Definitions

Learning Objectives

Learning Objectives

Related questions